Rats were repeatedly exposed to two- and three-trial series consisting of d
ifferent reinforced (R) and nonreinforced (N) trials in a fixed order on ex
tended visually distinct runways. in a T-maze. When initially presented wit
h the same sequence, RR or RN in Experiment 1 and RRN or RNR in Experiment
2. on each series in a session (Separate Presentations), rats developed slo
wer running speeds or bypassed the runwav in returning to the start chamber
on N more than on R trials. These serial response patterns occurred whethe
r rats experienced each sequence on a specific runway (Associated group) or
equally on different runways over sessions (Nonassociated group). When seq
uences were intermixed within each session, only the Associated group maint
ained its serial pattern responses to both sequences while the Nonassociate
d group only did so within the RRN sequence. When allowed to choose between
runwavs over trials, the Associated group tended to select the runway asso
ciated with the RR sequence on the first two free-choice trials while rats
in the Nonassociated group tended to alternate their choices of runways. Sw
itching the relevancy of the runway context in the second experiment caused
rats in each group to react like rats in the other group on forced-choice
trials. In terms of Capaldi's (1992) model of levels of chunking in serial
pattern learning, our findings indicate that rats learned to anticipate at
least second trial outcomes by using higher order list or contextually cued
chunking and also to anticipate third trial outcomes by using lower order
series chunking. (C) 2001 Academic Press.