Whether a drug such as levodopa, which is prescribed for long periods, may
be toxic is a legitimate and even indispensable question. The problem is no
different from that posed by other drugs-such as calcium antagonists, anti
hypertensives, or hormones-normally prescribed for chronic diseases. What,
however, is meant in this context by "toxic" (from the Greek toxicon, meani
ng poison)? Irrevocable damage such as cell loss should not be confused wit
h reversible side effects resulting from cell dysfunction. Clinically or ex
perimentally, levodopa has not been shown to accelerate neurodegeneration o
r cause permanent impairment of cell function in a manner that would result
in irreversible side effects. These data have been reasonably well establi
shed in vivo in animals and humans, although preliminary studies suggesting
that levodopa is a trophic factor remain unconfirmed. Like oxygen or calci
um, levodopa can be toxic in vitro when it is present in high concentration
s or in the absence of glial cells. However, glial cells are much more nume
rous than neurons in vivo, so these conditions cannot simply be extrapolate
d to three-dimensional brain structures in which protective interactions wi
th the cellular environment abound. Because levodopa remains the most effec
tive treatment available for Parkinson's disease, questions regarding timin
g or manner of administration of the drug should arise not because levodopa
is toxic to nerve cells, but because it causes reversible side effects. Wh
en the elementary rules of substitutive therapy to provide maximum comfort
while limiting side effects are followed, we need not fear that levodopa is
dangerous unless the contrary is proven.