Dj. Wright et al., Assessment of adenosine, arbutamine and dobutamine as pharmacological stress agents during Tc-99m-tetrofosmin SPECT imaging: a randomized study, NUCL MED C, 22(12), 2001, pp. 1305-1311
We evaluated the use of adenosine, dobutamine and arbutamine with Tc-99m-te
trofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging. Forty patients under investigation
for suspected coronary artery disease were recruited. Each had a resting sc
an and two separate stress scans on different days, in randomized cross-ove
r study. Resultant images were blindly reported in 13 segments per scan as
normal, reversible or fixed defects. A score was given (0-3) for segmental
defect severity. Haemodynamic responses were as expected for each agent. Su
bjective side effect scores did not differ overall between agents. Adenosin
e caused a significantly higher incidence of abnormal taste (54%) than dobu
tamine and arbutamine (both 23%) and a lower incidence of palpitations (25%
vs 69% and 54%, respectively), all P < 0.05. Arbutamine caused significant
ly more chest pain than adenosine (77% vs 46%) though less flushing (35% vs
68%), both P<0.5. Comparison of the results obtained showed highly signifi
cant levels of segmental agreement for visual and sen-Li-quantitative analy
sis between adenosine and arbutamine, kappa value and correlation coefficie
nt of 0.78 and 0.86, respectively, dobutamine and adenosine 0.69 and 0.78,
and arbutamine and dobutamine 0.75 and 0.78, all P<0.0001. Adenosine, arbut
amine and dobutamine differ in their haemodynamic response and side effect
profile but provide highly comparable results during Tc-99m SPECT imaging.
((C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins).