Jb. Gaudinski et al., The age of fine-root carbon in three forests of the eastern United States measured by radiocarbon, OECOLOGIA, 129(3), 2001, pp. 420-429
Using a new approach involving one-time measurements of radiocarbon (C-14)
in fine (<2 min diameter) root tissues we have directly measured the mean a
ge of fine-root carbon. We find that the carbon making up the standing stoc
k of fine roots in deciduous and coniferous forests of the eastern United S
tates has a mean age of 3-18 years for live fine roots, 10-18 years for dea
d fine roots, and 3-18 years for mixed live+dead fine roots. These C-14-der
ived mean ages represent the time C was stored in the plant before being al
located for root growth, plus the average lifespan (for live roots), plus t
he average time for the root to decompose (for dead roots and mixtures). Co
mparison of the C-14 content of roots known to have grown within I year wit
h the C-14 of atmospheric CO2 for the same period shows that root tissues a
re derived from recently fixed carbon, and the storage time prior to alloca
tion is <2 years and likely <1 year. Fine-root mean ages tend to increase w
ith depth in the soil. Live roots in the organic horizons are made of C fix
ed 3-8 years ago compared with 11-18 years in the mineral B horizons. The m
ean age of C in roots increases with root diameter and also is related to b
ranching order. Our results differ dramatically from previous estimates of
fine-root mean ages made using mass balance approaches and root-viewing cam
eras, which generally report life spans (mean ages for live roots) of a few
months to 1-2 years. Each method for estimating fine-root dynamics, includ
ing this new radiocarbon method, has biases. Root-viewing approaches tend t
o emphasize more rapidly cycling roots, while radiocarbon ages tend to refl
ect those components that persist longest in the soil. Our C-14-derived est
imates of long mean ages can be reconciled with faster estimates only if fi
ne-root populations have varying rates of root mortality and decomposition.
Our results indicate that it standard definition of fine roots, as those w
ith diameters of <2 mm, is inadequate to determine the most dynamic portion
of the root population. Recognition of the variability in fine-root dynami
cs is necessary to obtain better estimates of belowground C inputs.