D. Price et al., Flame retarding poly(methyl methacrylate) with phosphorus-containing compounds: comparison of an additive with a reactive approach, POLYM DEGR, 74(3), 2001, pp. 441-447
The flame retardance and thermal stability of a methyl methacrylate (MMA) c
opolymer reactively modified by copolymerisation of the MMA with diethyl (m
ethacryloyloxymethyl) phosphonate (DEMMP) have been compared with those of
poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) containing equivalent amounts of the addit
ive diethyl ethyl phosphonate (DEEP). DEEP can be regarded as having a stru
cture similar to that of a DEMMP comonomer unit and therefore the two compo
unds might be expected to confer about the same levels of flame retardance
to PMMA when used at similar concentrations. The incorporation of 3.5 wt.%
phosphor-us in both cases raises the limiting oxygen index of PMMA from 17.
2 to over 22. However, cone calorimetry shows that the MMA/DEMMP copolymer
is inherently more flame retardant than PMMA containing DEEP: the former ha
s a significantly lower peak rate of heat release than the latter (449 and
583 kW m(-2), respectively) and gives rise to a greater amount of char. The
rmogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the polymers indicates also that the MMA/D
EMMP copolymer is more thermally stable than PMMA whilst PMMA containing DE
EP is less thermally stable. Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) sho
ws that the MMA/DEMMP copolymer has physical and mechanical properties simi
lar to those of PMMA, whilst the low molecular weight DEEP plasticises PMMA
. resulting in a significantly reduced glass transition temperature, T-g. A
condensed phase mechanism of flame retardance in MMA/DEMMP has been identi
fied. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.