Rights, autonomy, privacy, and confidentiality are concepts commonly used i
n discussions concerning genetic information. When these concepts are thoug
ht of as denoting absolute norms and values which cannot be overriden by ot
her considerations, conflicts among them naturally occur. In this paper, th
ese and related notions are examined in terms of the duties and obligations
medical professionals and their clients can have regarding genetic knowled
ge. It is suggested that while the prevailing idea of autonomy is unhelpful
in the analysis of these duties, and the ensuing rights, an alternative re
ading of personal self-determination can provide a firmer basis for ethical
guidelines and policies in this field.