As knowledge increases about the human genome, prenatal genetic testing wil
l become cheaper, safer and more comprehensive. It is likely that there wil
l be a great deal of support for making prenatal testing for a wide range o
f genetic disorders a routine part of antenatal care. Such routine testing
is necessarily coercive in nature and does not involve the same standard of
consent as is required in other health care settings. This paper asks whet
her this level of coercion is ethically justifiable in this case, or whethe
r pregnant women have a right to remain in ignorance of the genetic make-up
of the fetus they are carrying. While information gained by genetic testin
g may be useful for pregnant women when making decisions about their pregna
ncy, it does not prevent harm to future children. It is argued that as this
kind of testing provides information in the interests of the pregnant wome
n and not in the interests of any future child, the same standards of conse
nt that are normally required for genetic testing should be required in thi
s instance.