BACKGROUND: Blood transfusion is a universally used, life-saving medical in
tervention. However, there are increasing concerns among patients about blo
od safety. This study investigates the effect of message framing, a means o
f presenting information, on confidence in blood transfusion safety.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The same factual information regarding the safety
of blood for transfusion was presented to a sample of 254 adult students (
donors and nondonors) as either a gain frame (lives saved), a loss frame (l
ives lost), or a combined frame (a loss frame expressed in a positive conte
xt). This provided a basic two-way, between-subjects design with 1) blood d
onation history (donors vs. nondonors) and 2) message frame (gain, loss, an
d combined) functioning as the between-groups factors. It was hypothesized
that participants would consider blood safer if information was presented a
s a gain frame. The role of stress appraisals as potential mediators of the
framing effect was also explored.
RESULTS: As predicted, participants receiving the gain-frame information we
re significantly more confident of the safety of blood for transfusion than
those receiving loss-frame information or both. This was unaffected by don
ation history or appraisals of stress associated with transfusion. The exte
nt to which blood was considered safe was negatively associated, independen
tly of framing effects, with perceptions that transfusion was threatening.
CONCLUSION: Information about transfusion should be conveyed to patients in
a form focusing on the positive, rather than the negative, known facts abo
ut the safety of blood.