Yf. Cheng et al., Single imaging modality evaluation of living donors in liver transplantation: Magnetic resonance imaging, TRANSPLANT, 72(9), 2001, pp. 1527-1533
Background. Liver graft size, anatomy of the bile duct and the vascular inf
low and outflow are essential for living related liver transplantation (LRL
T). Preoperative delineation of those variations that would change the oper
ative procedure to achieve a successful result especially in an emergency c
ondition.
Purpose. Our aim was to develop a rapid and noninvasive imaging diagnostic
method for the detection of anatomical variants that is mandatory for a saf
e operation when selecting potential liver transplant living donors. We use
d a different magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique, which enabled to u
s to exploit the anatomical landmark of the liver, signal enhancement of bl
ood flow in the abdomen, and the intrahepatic biliary routes inside the liv
er. Then, with the help of Advantage Window workstation reconstruction, the
reconstructed single vascular or biliary systems were displaced in a three
-dimensional fashion and the whole examination finished within 30 min.
Methods. Modification of the standard MR technique was performed on a super
conductive 1.5T whole body image scanner, MR arteriogaphy, venography, and
cholangiography with three-dimensional reconstruction in evaluating the ana
tomy of the hepatic arteries, hepatic veins, portal venous system, bile duc
ts, and liver size in potential liver transplant living donors. These anato
mical structures were compared with traditional imaging methods.
Results. In all 38 cases, as well as delineation of the portal vein detail
to the segmental level was satisfactorily obtained in this MR study. The im
ages were well displayed in a three-dimensional fashion, which had good cor
relation with images from traditional imaging modalities and operative find
ings. In 86.8% cases, the MR arteriography was well matched with the celiac
angiography. Of those 17 operative cases, estimation of liver volume was w
ell correlated with the liver graft within 3.9-12.5% variation. In the majo
r hepatic vein, we obtained 100% accuracy and 88.2% in the minor branches.
Of 12 donors received intraoperative cholangiography during liver donation,
good correlation of biliary anatomy was achieved. One donor was excluded f
rom graft donation due to the complicated arterial supply to the left liver
. According to the anatomical variation, surgical procedures in graft harve
sting and anastomosis were readjusted and no major complications were found
in those donors and all recipients survived after liver transplantation.
Conclusion. MR volumetry, venography, angiography, and cholangiography with
three-dimensional reconstruction is sufficient for all major imaging evalu
ation. It may replace the traditional conventional catheter angiography, co
mputed tomography, sonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as
a single investigation in the evaluation of the potential liver transplant
donors. Angiography is only valuable in suboptimal cases and intraoperative
cholangiography is only performed in biliary ductile variants.