S. Deckers et al., Therapy, glycaemic control and complications in type 1 diabetic patients: Results from a single centre cohort of 465 subjects, ACT CLIN B, 56(5), 2001, pp. 289-296
We analysed the clinical characteristics, the degree of glycaemic control a
nd the prevalence of complications in 465 type 1 diabetic adult patients (2
32 males), in view of current recommendations for metabolic and blood press
ure control. Age and diabetes duration were 45 +/- 17 and 20 +/- 13 years r
espectively (mean +/-1 SD). Daily insulin dose was 0.65 +/-0.24 U/kg b.w. 7
3% of patients received greater than or equal to3 injections/day, while 11%
had continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. All were practizing home blo
od glucose monitoring. Current HbA(1)c was 8.5% [7.7-9.3%] (median [percent
iles 25-75]). There was no difference in HbA(1)c according to number of inj
ections or CSII use. When patients were divided according to HbA(1)c quinti
les, significantly lower prevalences of retinopathy and neuropathy were fou
nd in quintile 1 individuals. A mean of 53 severe, hypoglycaemic episodes w
as reported per 100 patients/year, and they were more frequent in subjects
exhibiting better glycaemic control. High blood pressure levels were found
in 27% of subjects according to JNC-VI criteria. Fasting cholesterol (C), L
DL-C, HDL-C and triglycerides were within normal range. However, according
to current guidelines emphasizing on lower target thresholds, up to 27% of
patients exhibited some degree of dyslipidaemia, in particular LDL-C higher
than 3.3 mmol/l.
In conclusion, in this large cohort of type 1 diabetic patients regularly a
ttending a University Centre, overall glycaemic control remains above the s
atisfactory levels inferred from optimization studies. Although mean blood
pressure and blood lipids were up to recently deemed adequate, a (too) high
proportion of diabetic patients exhibited either hypertension and/or dysli
pidaemia according to revised therapeutic goals cut-offs.