How an ideologically concentrated minority can trump a dispersed majority:Nonmedian voter results for plurality, run-off, and sequential eliminationelections

Citation
Aj. Mcgann et al., How an ideologically concentrated minority can trump a dispersed majority:Nonmedian voter results for plurality, run-off, and sequential eliminationelections, AM J POL SC, 46(1), 2002, pp. 134-147
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Politucal Science & public Administration
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00925853 → ACNP
Volume
46
Issue
1
Year of publication
2002
Pages
134 - 147
Database
ISI
SICI code
0092-5853(200201)46:1<134:HAICMC>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
In contrast to Downs' (1957) median voter result for two-candidate election s, we should not expect multicandidate elections to produce outcomes around the median, even on average. Rather the winning candidate will tend to be between the median voter and the mode. This is true whether we consider plu rality, run-off, or sequential elimination elections, and whether or not th e electorate is divided into factions that control the nomination of candid ates. For an unfactionalized electorate, computer simulation with randomly positi oned candidates is used to model various electoral systems. This is because no equilibrium solution exists for this case. For a factionalized electora te, a game-theoretic model of faction formation is used. The results suggest that an ideologically cohesive minority around the mode of the population distribution may have a disproportionate influence on th e outcome. These results can be applied to party leadership in the U.S. Hou se, following Grofman, Koetzle, and McGann (forthcoming).