Isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia in pigs with a preexistent gas exchange defect

Citation
A. Kleinsasser et al., Isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia in pigs with a preexistent gas exchange defect, ANESTHESIOL, 95(6), 2001, pp. 1422-1426
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANESTHESIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00033022 → ACNP
Volume
95
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1422 - 1426
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3022(200112)95:6<1422:IASAIP>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Background Decreased arterial partial pressure of oxygen (Pa-O2) during vol atile anesthesia is well-known. Halothane has been examined with the multip le inert gas elimination technique and has been shown to alter the distribu tion of pulmonary blood flow and thus Pa-O2. The effects of isoflurane and sevoflurane on pulmonary gas exchange remain unknown. The authors hypothesi zed that sevoflurane with a relatively high minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) would result in significantly more gas exchange disturbances in compa rison with isoflurane or control. Methods: This study was performed in a porcine model with an air pneumoperi toneum that generates a reproducible gas exchange defect. After a baseline measurement of pulmonary gas exchange (multiple inert gas elimination techn ique) during propofol anesthesia, 21 pigs were randomly assigned to three g roups of seven animals each. One group received isoflurane anesthesia, one group received sevoflurane anesthesia, and one group was continued on propo fol anesthesia (control). After 30 min of volatile anesthesia at 1 MAC or p ropofol anesthesia, a second measurement (multiple inert gas elimiiation te chnique) was performed. Results: At the second measurement, inert gas shunt was 15 +/-3% (mean +/- SD) during sevoflurane anesthesia versus 9 +/-1% during propofol anesthesia (P = 0.02). Blood flow to normal ventilation/perfusion (<(V) overdot>(A)/< (Q) overdot>) lung areas was 83 +/-5% during sevoflurane anesthesia versus 89 +/-1% during propofol anesthesia (P = 0.04). This resulted in a Pa-O2 of 88 +/- 11 mmHg during sevoflurane anesthesia versus 102 +/- 15 mmHg during propofol anesthesia (P = 0.04). inert gas and blood gas variables during i soflurane anesthesia did not differ significantly from those obtained durin g propofol anesthesia. Conclusions: In pigs with an already existent gas exchange defect, sevoflur ane anesthesia but not isoflurane anesthesia causes significantly more gas exchange disturbances than propofol anesthesia does.