X. Pivot et al., Result of two randomized trials comparing nolatrexed (Thymitaq (TM)) versus methotrexate in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer, ANN ONCOL, 12(11), 2001, pp. 1595-1599
We report on two randomized trials performed in the USA and Europe, which c
ompared methotrexate and nolatrexed as treatment for patients with recurren
t head and neck cancer. Eligibility criteria included: histologically confi
rmed squamous-cell carcinoma, measurable disease, adequate hematological, r
enal and hepatic functions, failure of a first-line chemotherapy, and infor
med consent. Methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) was weekly given by short infusion, an
d nolatrexed 725 mg/m(2) per day was administered as a five-day continuous
infusion, every three weeks. A total of 139 patients (63 in the USA, 76 in
Europe) were randomized based on a ratio of 2/1: 93 and 46 received nolatre
xed and methotrexate, respectively. Patient characteristics included 115 ma
les and 24 females; median age 60 years. In the nolatrexed arm, the followi
ng grade 3-4 toxicities occurred: neutropenia (29.9%) with 3.1% of febrile
neutropenia, mucositis (33.3%), and vomiting (10.3%). In the MTX arm, the g
rade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (7.1%) and mucositis (6.9%). There was
no difference in activity between the nolatrexed and the methotrexate trea
tment: 3.3% and 10.8% of objective responses, 1.9 versus 1.5 months of dise
ase-free progression and 3.5 versus 3.7 months of overall survival, respect
ively. Nolatrexed has demonstrated a similar activity to methotrexate.