M. Paulussen et al., Second malignancies after Ewing tumor treatment in 690 patients from a cooperative German/Austrian/Dutch study, ANN ONCOL, 12(11), 2001, pp. 1619-1630
Background: Ewing tumor treatment involves high cumulative doses of alkylat
ing agents and topoisomerase inhibitors, drugs capable of inducing second c
ancers. We analyzed the second cancer risk in a large cohort of consistentl
y treated patients.
Patients and methods: Six hundred ninety Ewing tumor patients were treated
between 1992 and 1999 with local therapy and vincristine, doxorubicin, ifos
famide and/or cyclophosphamide, and antinomycin D, with or without etoposid
e as a randomized question. Second cancer incidences were estimated by comp
eting risk analyses; standardized incidence ratios (SIR) in comparison to r
egistry data were compiled.
Results:After a median observation time of 56 months (32 months for survivo
rs), 6 of 690 patients had developed second cancers: MDS/AML, two, ALL/NHL,
two, squamous cell carcinoma, one, liposarcoma, one. SIR were increased 20
-30 fold in comparison to the general population. The cumulative second can
cer risk five years after diagnosis of the Ewing tumor was 0.0093 for the t
otal group, zero for patients without etoposide, and 0.0118 with etoposide.
Additional phase II high-dose therapy increased the risk to 0.0398 after f
ive years.
Conclusions: The second cancder risk observed was in the range to be expect
ed in cancer survivors. High-dose therapy, and less markedly, etoposide, ma
y contribute to the overall second cancer risk.