H. Franz et E. Roitberg, A comparison of learning performance of dwarf goats in visual discrimination tasks with two or four simultaneously offered stimuli, ARCH TIER, 44(6), 2001, pp. 661-669
A comparison of learning performance of dwarf goats in visual discriminatio
n tasks with two or four simultaneously offered stimuli (two-choice and fou
r-choice design) was carried out with the automatic learning device 'Field
Monitor'. One S+ Stimulus and three identical S- Stimuli by the four-choice
design, and one S+ Stimulus and one S- Stimulus (the same patterns as by f
our choice) by two-choice design were offered. In both experimental designs
the positions of stimuli (simple geometric figures) on the screen changed
pseudo-randomly after each choice.
Since the seventh test day the proportion of successfully learning kids by
the four-choice design was substantially higher than that for the two-choic
e design. Our finding makes it questionable whether the internationally acc
epted two-choice design is really optimal. In our further experiments in wh
ich over 200 animals have been examined for several months the four-choice
design has been involved providing a very successful learning.