Evaluation by ambulatory blood pressure measurement of the antihypertensive effect of the fixed combination therapy valsartan 80 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12,5 mg

Citation
B. Vaisse et al., Evaluation by ambulatory blood pressure measurement of the antihypertensive effect of the fixed combination therapy valsartan 80 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12,5 mg, ARCH MAL C, 94(8), 2001, pp. 907-912
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
ARCHIVES DES MALADIES DU COEUR ET DES VAISSEAUX
ISSN journal
00039683 → ACNP
Volume
94
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
907 - 912
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9683(200108)94:8<907:EBABPM>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate by ambulatory blood pressur e measurement (ABPM) the 24 hours antihypertensive efficacy of the fixed co mbination therapy, valsartan 80 mg+hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (V+H), once daily, after 6 weeks of treatment, in patients with mild to moderate hypert ension. Study design: It was a French, multicenter, double blind, randomized trial in parallel groups comparing V+H and placebo. After an initial two weeks pl acebo period, patients were assigned to receive either V+H or placebo for s ix weeks. Were eligible those with clinical arterial blood pressure, measur ed by sphygmomanometer, between 160/95 and 209/114 mmHg after monotherapy. A 26 hours ABPM, with Spacelabs 90207, was done at JO and J42 (one measurem ent every 15 minutes, in day time and at night). Responders were defined as a fall in day diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to5 mmHg and/ or day diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg with ABPM. Results: 123 of the 138 randomized patients had two interpretative measurem ents. Their average age was 59+10 years. 57% (78) of them were males and th eir average ABPM before treatment was 143+/-15/88+/-11 mmHg. With V+H, the reduction of the systolic and the diastolic blood pressure measured by ABPM , was significally more important than with placebo (SBP: - 15.4 +/- 10.9 m mHg versus -0.6 +/- 7.7 mmHg, p<0.001; DBP: -9.1 +/- 7 mmHg versus -0.4 +/- 5.4 mmHg, p<0.001). Pulse pressure (PP) was also significally reduced with the combination therapy V+H, but it was not modified with placebo (-6.3+5. 5 mmHg versus -0.2+4.1 mmHg, p<0.001). ABPM responder rate was 73% with V+H versus 24% with placebo (p<0.001). Trough/peak ratio was 80.3% for systoli c blood pressure and 57.3% for diastolic blood pressure. The combination VH was as well tolerated as placebo. Conclusion: The fixed combination V+H used for treatment of hypertension, a fter failure of monotherapy, is very effective in reducing pulse pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, over 24 hours, homogeneously, and is as well tolerated as placebo.