Inpatient care for uncomplicated bronchiolitis - Comparison with Milliman and Robertson guidelines

Citation
Nm. Kini et al., Inpatient care for uncomplicated bronchiolitis - Comparison with Milliman and Robertson guidelines, ARCH PED AD, 155(12), 2001, pp. 1323-1327
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10724710 → ACNP
Volume
155
Issue
12
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1323 - 1327
Database
ISI
SICI code
1072-4710(200112)155:12<1323:ICFUB->2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Context: Bronchiolitis is the most common lower respiratory tract infection in infancy. A recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report con firmed that hospitalization rates for bronchiolitis have increased 2.4-fold from 1980 to 1996. Controversies exist about optimal treatment plans. Mill iman and Robertson recommend ambulatory care management; in case of hospita lization, the recommended length of stay is 1 day. Objectives: To relate actual practice variation for infants admitted with u ncomplicated bronchiolitis to Milliman and Robertson's recommendations. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: General care wards of 8 pediatric hospitals of the Child Health Ac countability Initiative during the winter of 1998-1999. Patients: First-tine admissions for uncomplicated bronchiolitis in patients not previously diagnosed as having asthma and who were younger than 1 year . Main Outcome Measures: Respiratory rate, monitored interventions, attainmen t of discharge criteria goals, and length of stay. Results: Eight hundred forty-six patients were included in the final analys is: 85.7% were younger than 6 months, 48.5% were nonwhite, and 64.1% were M edicaid recipients or self-pay. On admission to the hospital, 18.3% of the infants had respiratory rates higher than higher than 80 breaths per minute , 53.8% received supplemental oxygen therapy, and 52.6% received intravenou s fluids. These proportions decreased to 1.9%, 33.8%, and 20.3%, respective ly, 1 day after admission, and to 0.7%, 20.1%, and 8.6%, respectively, 2 da ys after admission. The average length of stay was 2.8 days (SD, 2.3 days). Conclusions: Milliman and Robertson's recommendations do not correspond to practice patterns observed at the hospitals participating in this study; no hospital met the Milliman and Robertson recommended 1-day goal length of s tay. Administration of monitored intervention persisted past the second day of hospitalization.