Objective: To compare tuberculosis skin test (TST) reading rates between ch
ildren whose tests were read by school nurses following specific requests b
y physicians and those who relied on their parents to get their tests read,
either at school or at the physician's office.
Design: A randomized controlled trial.
Setting: An urban hospital-based pediatric practice.
Participants: Healthy low-income Hispanic and African American children age
d 5 to 17 years whose physicians ordered TSTs at their routine physical exa
minations. Subjects attended 1 of 68 public schools. Nurses at these school
s were willing to read student TSTs, and received instructions about how to
read and report the results back to the physician's office.
Intervention: Subjects were randomized to a control group (routine TST plac
ement, with no physician-to-school nurse communication) or to an interventi
on group (routine TST placement, with physician-to-school nurse communicati
on).
Main Outcome Measures: Tuberculosis skin test reading rates between the 2 g
roups were compared. Impediments to TST reading and reporting were investig
ated.
Results: One hundred thirty-four children were enrolled, 54 (40%) in the co
ntrol group and 80 (60%) in the intervention group. More patients in the in
tervention group had their TSTs read by 72 hours compared with those in the
control group (74 [92%] vs 30 [56%]; P < .001). The low reading rate in th
e control group was best attributed to communication failures.
Conclusion: Systematic collaboration with school nurses can increase TST re
ading rates.