Ej. Wang et al., Active transport of fluorescent P-glycoprotein substrates: Evaluation as markers and interaction with inhibitors, BIOC BIOP R, 289(2), 2001, pp. 580-585
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Biochemistry & Biophysics
Journal title
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
With P-glycoprotein (P-gp) continuing to have prominence among the ABC tran
sporters for its ability to remove various xenobiotics from many cell types
, accurate and robust methods for estimating the exposure of drug, carcinog
en, toxicant, pesticide, and even some endobiotics to tissues and cells aff
ected by P-gp are valuable. The inhibition of P-gp active transport of mole
cules, therefore, has often been quantified by concentration dependence of
inhibitor effect on fluorescent substrate marker efflux mediated by this en
zyme, with much evidence indicating two asymmetric yet interdependent subst
rate binding sites on P-gp. A uniqueness in the pair of binding sites could
result in distinct effects of an inhibitor on the transport of certain sub
strates, thus leading to differences in fluorescent substrate responsivenes
s or sensitivity. Seven different fluorescent substrates of P-gp were quant
itatively tested for their responsiveness to inhibition by a wide range of
P-gp substrates/inhibitors. Interesting differences were observed in the IC
50 values caused by each of the inhibitors employed, in part exemplified by
DNR and LDS being generally more sensitive to inhibition effects than any
other fluorescent marker. However, no clear trend emerged to designate any
fluorochrome marker as the most or least responsive to inhibition. Furtherm
ore, LDS is more sensitive to some P-gp inhibitors than the substrate marke
r DNR, generally the most responsive. These results support the assertion o
f two unequal substrate binding sites that are allosterically dependent on
each other. Therefore, an inhibitor that favors binding to the site opposit
e from that favored by a particular marker may have significant transduced
effects through the protein between the two binding sites. Nevertheless, al
though either DNR or LDS is generally the fluorescent substrate most respon
sive to inhibition, there may be other substrates yet even more sensitive.
(C) 2001 Elsevier Science.