Myoclonic-astatic epilepsy of early childhood - clinical and EEG analysis of myoclonic-astatic seizures, and discussions on the nosology of the syndrome
H. Oguni et al., Myoclonic-astatic epilepsy of early childhood - clinical and EEG analysis of myoclonic-astatic seizures, and discussions on the nosology of the syndrome, BRAIN DEVEL, 23(7), 2001, pp. 757-764
Purpose: The aim of this study is to elucidate the clinical and neurophysio
logical characteristics of the myoclonic, myoclonic-astatic, or astatic sei
zures in patients with myoclonic-astatic epilepsy (MAE) of early childhood,
and to discuss on the nosology of this unique epileptic syndrome. Subjects
: The subjects included 30 patients, who fulfilled the following modified I
nternational League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) criteria for MAE, and whose mai
n seizures were captured by video-electroencephalographs (EEG) or polygraph
s. The modified ILAE criteria includes: (1) normal development before onset
of epilepsy and absence of organic cerebral abnormalities; (2) onset of my
oclonic, myoclonic-astatic or astatic seizures between 7 months and 6 years
of age; (3) presence of generalized spike- or poly spike-wave EEG discharg
es at 2-3 Hz, without focal spike discharges; and (4) exclusion of severe a
nd benign myoclonic epilepsy (SME, BME) in infants and cryptogenic Lennox-G
astaut syndrome based on the ILAE definitions.
Results: The seizures were investigated precisely by video-EEG (n = 5), pol
ygraph (n = 2), and video-polygraph (n = 23), which identified myoclonic se
izures in 16 cases (myoclonic group), atonic seizures, with or without prec
eding minor myoclonus, in 11 cases (atonic group), and myoclonic-atonic sei
zures in three cases. All patients had a history of drop attacks, apart fro
m ten patients with rnyoclonic seizures. Myoclonic seizures, involving main
ly the axial muscles were classified into those with mild intensity not suf
ficient to cause the patients to fall (n = 10) and those that are stronger
and sufficient to cause astatic falling due to flexion of the waist or exte
nsion of the trunk (n = 6). Patients in the atonic group fell straight down
ward, landed on their buttocks, and recovered immediately. Analysis of the
ictal EEGs showed that all attacks corresponded to the generalized spike or
poly spikes - and-wave complexes. In the atonic form, the spikeand-wave mo
rphology was characterized by a positive-negative-deep-positive wave follow
ed by a large negative slow wave. In two patients, the intensity of the ato
nia appeared to correspond to the depth of the positive component of the sp
ike-and-wave complexes. We did not detect any significant differences in th
e clinical and EEG features and prognosis, between the atonic and myoclonic
groups.
Conclusions: Although the determination of exact seizure type is a prerequi
site for diagnosing an epileptic syndrome, the strict differentiation of se
izure type into either a rnyoclonic or atonic form, does not appear to have
a significant impact on the outcome or in delineating this unique epilepti
c syndrome. At present, we consider it better to follow the current Interna
tional Classification of Epileptic Syndromes and Epilepsies until a more ap
propriate system than the clinico-electrical approach for classifying patie
nts with MAE is available. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserv
ed.