H. Tulchinsky et al., Salvage abdominal surgery in patients with a retained rectal stump after restorative proctocolectomy and stapled anastomosis, BR J SURG, 88(12), 2001, pp. 1602-1606
Background: The introduction of surgical stapling instruments has widened t
he use of restorative proctocolectomy. Too high a distal transection of the
rectum can, however, produce a retained rectal stump, which may cause symp
toms. A study of the operative and functional data in a consecutive series
of patients undergoing salvage surgery for retained rectal stump was undert
aken.
Methods: Twenty-five patients referred between January 1990 and September 2
000 for pouch dysfunction were identified as having a retained rectal stump
. Twenty-two underwent abdominoanal revision. The hospital notes were revie
wed and function was assessed during outpatient visits, by postal questionn
aire and by telephone interview.
Results: Median operating time was 225 (range 170-340) min and median hospi
tal stay was 15 (range 8-48) days. There was no operative death. Five pouch
es were excised. Seventeen patients were available for functional assessmen
t. Median follow-up was 22.5 (range 4-114) months. Median 24-h frequency be
fore and after operation was 12 (range 4-20) and 6 (range 3-12) respectivel
y, and median night-time frequency was 4 (range 0-8) and 0.5 (range 0-4) re
spectively. Fifteen patients reported marked subjective improvement in pouc
h function and quality of life.
Conclusion: Major revisional surgery for symptomatic retained rectal stump
after restorative proctocolectomy, with stapled anastomosis was successful
in 15 of 22 patients. These results are worse than the outcome following fi
rst-time restorative proctocolectomy with anastomosis constructed at the an
al level. Pouch-rectal anastomosis should be avoided.