Impact of total mesorectal excision on the results of surgery of distal rectal cancer

Authors
Citation
Wl. Law et Kw. Chu, Impact of total mesorectal excision on the results of surgery of distal rectal cancer, BR J SURG, 88(12), 2001, pp. 1607-1612
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00071323 → ACNP
Volume
88
Issue
12
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1607 - 1612
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1323(200112)88:12<1607:IOTMEO>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Background: This study reviewed the results of surgery for distal rectal ca ncer (tumours within 6 cm of the anal verge) following the introduction of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in one institution. Methods: Two hundred and five patients who had undergone surgical resection of rectal cancer within 6 cm of the anal verge were included. The demograp hic, operative and follow-up data were collected prospectively. Comparisons were made between patients who had different surgical procedures. Results: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) was performed in 27.8 per cent of patients, falling from 36.0 per cent in the first 3 years to 20.0 per cent in the last 3 years of the study. The overall operative mortality rate was 1.5 per cent and the morbidity rate 30.2 per cent. With a mean follow-up o f 36 months, local recurrence occurred in 28 of the 185 patients who had cu rative resection. The 5-year actuarial local recurrence rates for double-st apled anastomosis, peranal coloanal anastomosis and APR were 11.2, 34.6 and 23.5 per cent respectively. The local recurrence rate was significantly lo wer for double-stapled low anterior resection than for the other types of o peration. The overall 5-year survival rate in patients with low anterior re section and APR was 69.1 and 51.1 per cent respectively (P = 0.12). Conclusion: With the practice of total mesorectal excision, APR was necessa ry in only 27.8 per cent of patients with rectal cancer within 6 cm of the anal verge. The local recurrence rate was much lower in patients with doubl e-stapled low anterior resection than in those treated with APR or peranal anastomosis.