Objectives To compare the use of three electronic medical records systems b
y doctors in Norwegian hospitals for general clinical tasks.
Design Cross sectional questionnaire survey. Semistructured telephone inter
views with key staff in information technology in each hospital for details
of local implementation of the systems.
Setting 32 hospital units in 19 Norwegian hospitals with electronic medical
records systems.
Setting 32 hospital units in 19 Norwegian hospitals with electronic medical
records systems.
Participants 227 (72%) of 314 hospital doctors responded, equally distribut
ed between the three electronic medical records systems.
Main outcome measures Proportion of respondents who used the electronic sys
tem, calculated for each of 23 tasks; difference in proportions of users of
different systems when functionality of systems was similar.
Results Most tasks listed in the questionnaire (15/23) were generally cover
ed with implemented functions in the electronic medical records systems. Ho
wever, the systems were used for only 2-7 of the tasks, mainly associated w
ith reading patient data. Respondents showed significant differences in fre
quency of use of the different systems for four tasks for which the systems
offered equivalent functionality. The respondents scored highly in compute
r literacy (72.2/100), and computer use showed no correlation with responde
nts' age, sex, or work position. User satisfaction scores were generally po
sitive (67.2/100), with some difference between the systems.
Conclusions Doctors used electronic medical records systems for far fewer t
asks than the systems supported.