This article addresses the methods used to preserve the life of a sickly ne
onate-that is, a child described as "languid" in the immediate period after
birth. By looking at the work of some seventeenth-century midwifery author
s, we can see how a fragile baby was handled in the period before formal tr
aining in midwifery and in the appropriate use of forceps. The article asse
sses the recognized causes of neonatal risk at the tithe of William Smellie
. Examples from the manuscript midwifery case histories of William Hey, F.R
.S. (1736-1819), reveal how a provincial man-midwife handled at-risk babies
in domiciliary deliveries. The article also places William Hey within the
wider group of eighteenth-century men-midwives and those whose work was lea
ding them toward neonatal and infant care. Respect for life, parental love
and grief, and the status of men-midwives in the last half of the eighteent
h century are discussed.