Mj. Edel et al., Comparison of vascularity and angiogenesis in primary invasive mammary carcinomas and in their respective axillary lymph node metastases, CLIN EXP M, 18(8), 2001, pp. 695-702
It is well established that the ability of a neoplasm to induce a blood sup
ply from a pre-existing circulation (angiogenesis) is a major factor in tum
our growth, invasion and metastasis. However, the angiogenic potential of m
etastases and their subsequent growth have not been extensively studied. Th
e question arises: can metastatic clones induce the same level of angiogene
sis as in the primary neoplasm they emanated from? In this study it is hypo
thesised that in the same patient the level of vascularity and angiogenesis
is the same in both the primary invasive ductal carcinoma and in the axill
ary lymph node metastasis at the time of surgery, according to Kerbels theo
ry of clonal-dominance. To directly address the hypothesis, morphological m
easures of the established blood/lymphatic circulation (vascularity) as wel
l as estimates of angiogenesis (endothelial cell proliferation) were measur
ed in primary tumours and directly compared to the same parameters in the c
orresponding lymph node metastasis in a case by case basis (n=17). The resu
lts demonstrate varying associations between the level of vascularity and a
ngiogenesis between matched individual tumours and their metastatic lymph n
odal deposits. It is possible that either variations in the angiogenic char
acteristics of the metastasising clone or local or systemic promoters or in
hibitors of angiogenesis influence tumour angiogenesis at the different sit
es.