Jm. Kovarik et al., Influence of hepatic impairment on everolimus pharmacokinetics: Implications for dose adjustment, CLIN PHARM, 70(5), 2001, pp. 425-430
Objective: We assessed the influence of hepatic impairment on the pharmacok
inetics of the immunosuppressant everolimus to provide dose recommendations
for clinical use.
Methods: In this open-label, single-dose, case-control study, 8 subjects wi
th liver cirrhosis classed as moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score
, 7-9) and 8 demographically matched healthy control subjects received a si
ngle oral 2-mg dose of everolimus. Routine safety assessments were made, an
d blood samples were taken for determination of everolimus concentrations a
nd protein binding.
Results: The apparent clearance of everolimus was significantly reduced by
53% in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared with healthy subj
ects (9.1 +/- 3.1 versus 19.4 +/- 5.8 L/h). This was manifested by a 115% h
igher area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) (245 +/- 91 versu
s 114 +/- 45 ng (.) h/ml) and 84% prolonged half-life (79 +/- 42 versus 43
+/- 18 hours) in subjects with hepatic impairment. The rate of absorption o
f everolimus was not altered by hepatic impairment on the basis of the maxi
mum blood concentration (C-max) and time to reach C-max (t(max)). Protein b
inding was similar in the two groups (73.8% +/- 3.6% versus 73.5% +/- 2.4%)
. A significant positive correlation of the everolimus AUC with bilirubin l
evel (r = 0.86) and a significant negative correlation with albumin concent
ration (r = 0.72) was observed.
Conclusions: The dose of everolimus should initially be reduced by half in
patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment on the basis of the Chil
d-Pugh classification. Therapeutic monitoring would be a helpful adjunct to
subsequent titration of everolimus exposure in this subpopulation. Everoli
mus has not been assessed in patients with severe hepatic impairment.