HLA phenotypes of ESRD patients are risk factors in the panel-reactive antibody (PRA) response

Citation
E. Heise et al., HLA phenotypes of ESRD patients are risk factors in the panel-reactive antibody (PRA) response, CLIN TRANSP, 15, 2001, pp. 22-27
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
09020063 → ACNP
Volume
15
Year of publication
2001
Supplement
6
Pages
22 - 27
Database
ISI
SICI code
0902-0063(2001)15:<22:HPOEPA>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
To determine whether recipient HLA phenotypes are correlated with an increa sed or decreased risk of alloantibody sensitization in end-stage renal dise ase (ESRD) candidates for first or repeat kidney transplantation; we analyz ed 19 440 kidney allograft recipients consisting of 13 216 Caucasians and 6 224 non-Caucasians transplanted between 10/87 and 11/98 at South-Eastern Or gan Procurement Foundation (SEOPF) member institutions. Relative risk value s and 95% confidence limits were obtained using Wolfe's method. Logistic re gression was used to adjust for covariates that influence sensitization, i. e. ethnicity, gender, age, pregnancies, transfusions, primary/repeat transp lant and living versus cadaver donor. Univariate analysis of the entire coh ort indicated that nine HLA allelotypes (DR 1,4.7; 138,12,40; A1.2,11) were associated with a significantly reduced risk of sensitization, and five al lelotypes (B42,B53; A10, 19,36) were associated with an increased risk of P RA responses. Corrected for the number of statistical comparisons, recipien ts with DR 1, DR4, A1 or A2 were 15% less likely to be sensitized per allel otype. Recipients with B42, B53 or A36 were at increased risk of preformed antibodies. after correction of the P value, for an average of 38'% increas ed risk per allelotype. In the multivariate analysis, HLA phenotypes identi fied as independent risk factors associated with protection against sensiti zation were DR 1,4,7; B12(44,45); and A1,2, with an average reduced risk of 9% per allelotype. The only independent susceptibility allelotype was A36 with an increased risk of -29%. The A10 (25,26,34,66) group reached borderl ine significance. We also looked for HLA-DR.-B,-A combinations that could p otentially represent protective or at risk haplotypes/genotypes. Stepwise l ogistic regression identified five combinations associated with protection: DR1-B35-A3; DR1-B35-A2; DR1-B44-A2; DR4-B44-A2; DR7-B57-A1 (RR range 0.83- 0.63) with 27% average reduced risk per combination. Phenotype combinations associated with an increased risk of sensitization were: DR2-B44-A2; DR2-B 53-A2; DR3-B8-A1; DR3-B42-A30; DR6-B42-A30; DR11-B53-A30 (RR range 2.76-1.4 8) with an average increased risk of 70% per combination. This study provid es strong evidence that HLA-linked genes influence the anti-HLA PRA respons e. The magnitude of the altered PRA response risk in DR-B-A combinations wa s approximately twice that of the allelotypes at individual loci. HLA-DR ge nes seemed to contribute most of the altered risk. The correlations between DR types and PRA responsiveness are consistent with the DR types previousl y regarded as predictors of kidney graft survival. The magnitude of increas ed PRA risk attributable to an allelotype or combination was approximately twice that associated with a decreased risk. We conclude that some HLA clas s II-linked genes modulate the PRA response in a clinically significant man ner. This immune response gene (Ir) regulation probably operates through po lymorphic HLA molecules in their physiologic roles of antigen processing an d presentation to helper T cells.