The geographical distribution of primary biliary cirrhosis in a well-defined cohort

Citation
Mi. Prince et al., The geographical distribution of primary biliary cirrhosis in a well-defined cohort, HEPATOLOGY, 34(6), 2001, pp. 1083-1088
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology","da verificare
Journal title
HEPATOLOGY
ISSN journal
02709139 → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1083 - 1088
Database
ISI
SICI code
0270-9139(200112)34:6<1083:TGDOPB>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
The incidence of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) varies widely between regi ons. However, little is known about variation within regions and the degree to which this may reflect environmental risk factors. The aim of this stud y was to describe the spatial distribution of cases of PBC in a defined reg ion of Northeast England over a defined period, and to assess the magnitude of any departure from random spatial distribution. Seven hundred seventy p atients with established PBC were identified in a previous comprehensive ca se finding study. A total of 3,044 control locations were randomly selected from postcode (zip code) data weighted for number of drop off points per p ostcode. Geographical analysis was performed by testing both for spatial va riation in risk and local clustering by using previously described point pr ocess methods. Both tests used the same null hypothesis that risk of diseas e does not vary spatially and cases occur independently of each other. Stat istically significant spatial variations in risk were found in the whole st udy region (P <.001) and in the major urban area within the region (P <.004 ). Risk was higher in the urban area of Tyneside than in the surrounding ru ral area. Within the rural area, spatial variation in risk was equivocal (P =.012), but there was significant (P =.001) clustering of cases (estimated average cluster effect approximately 10 excess cases within a 7-km radius) . PBC occurred to a density of 10.7 cases/km(2) in the highest risk areas. In conclusion, PBC is unevenly distributed in Northeast England. This may r eflect one or more environmental risk factors in its etiology.