L. Veselsky et al., EFFECT OF BOAR SEMINAL IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE COMPONENT ON HUMORAL IMMUNE-RESPONSE IN MICE, American journal of reproductive immunology [1989], 38(2), 1997, pp. 106-113
PROBLEM: The effect of seminal immunosuppressive component (ISF) on th
e primary and secondary antibody response, induced by soluble and/or c
orpuscular antigens, was evaluated in the sera obtained at different i
ntervals before and after immunizations. The duration of the immune su
ppression induced by ISF treatment within the primary and secondary im
munizations was also determined. METHOD OF STUDY: The ability of the s
eminal immunosuppressive component to suppress the primary and seconda
ry antibody response was evaluated by enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent as
say (ELISA) in the sera of mice treated in vivo with the immunosuppres
sor before and after immunization with antigens. Likewise, the duratio
n of the immune suppression induced by the seminal immunosuppressor ad
ministered before the primary and secondary immunizations was tested b
y ELISA with antisera to keyhole limpets hemocyanin. RESULTS: Intraven
ous and rectal deposition of ISF led to a suppression of the primary a
nd secondary antibody response to soluble and corpuscular antigens. Th
e most effective suppression of the immune response was achieved in mi
ce treated with immunosuppressor 3 days before the immunization with a
ntigens. Also the secondary antibody response to the challenging antig
en was significantly suppressed by ISE The production of immunoglobuli
n G (IgG), IgM, and IgA to keyhole limpets hemocyanin was depressed fo
r a relatively long period in mice treated with the immunosuppressor.
The results indicated that the preexposure is needed for maximal immun
osuppression of the primary antibody production. The treatment with IS
F led to a prolonged immunosuppression but not to permanent tolerance
to the challenging antigen. CONCLUSIONS: The in vivo deposition of sem
en may compromise some aspects of the immune system and may be an impo
rtant factor in the development of viral and bacterial infections. The
suppression of humoral immune response suggests potential uses of sem
inal immunosuppressor for the animal model study in the therapy of ant
ibody-mediated diseases.