We recently implemented intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) at our insti
tution. In this study, we evaluate the dosimetric merits of the application
of this technique to the treatment of prostate cancer. Each MAT treatment
plan incorporated bilateral overlapping arcs. The dose from each beam segme
nt was computed using the three-dimensional dose model of a clinical treatm
ent planning system (Render Plan 3.5, Precision Therapy). The weights assig
ned to the individual arc segments were optimized using a gradient search m
ethod. For 12 patients, comparisons were made between the MAT treatment pla
ns and corresponding plans using fixed cone-beam intensity-modulated radiot
herapy (IMRT) from a commercial inverse planning system (CORVUS, NOMOS Corp
.). We found that the optimized IMAT treatments produced similar dose distr
ibutions to the IMRT deliveries. Compared with the IMRT treatments, the IMA
T treatments produced slightly less target dose homogeneity with consistent
ly greater sparing of the rectum in regions of lower dose. The trade-off be
tween target dose conformity and rectum sparing can be adjusted in both opt
imization procedures. Because the total beam-on time for MAT delivery is 1
to 2 minutes with approximately 5-6 minutes of patient setup time, the deli
very efficiency of the MAT treatment was significantly better than the mult
iple-beam IMRT treatment. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.