M. Engelsman et al., Field size reduction enables ISO-NTCP escalation of tumor control probability for irradiation of lung tumors, INT J RAD O, 51(5), 2001, pp. 1290-1298
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Purpose: With the mean lung dose (MLD) as an estimator for the normal tissu
e complication probability (NTCP) of the lung, we assessed whether the prob
ability of tumor control of lung tumors might be increased by dose escalati
on in combination with a reduction of field sizes, thus increasing target d
ose inhomogeneity while maintaining a constant MLD.
Methods and Materials: An 8-MV AP-PA irradiation of a lung tumor, located i
n a cylindrically symmetric lung-equivalent phantom, was modeled using nume
rical simulation. Movement of the clinical target volume (CTV) due to patie
nt breathing and setup errors was simulated. The probability of tumor contr
ol, expressed as the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) of the CTV, was assessed
as a function of field size, under the constraint of a constant MLD. The a
pproach was tested for a treatment of a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
patient using the beam directions of the clinically applied treatment plan.
Results: In the phantom simulation it was shown that by choosing field size
s that ensured a minimum dose of 95% in the CTV ("conventional" plan) takin
g into account setup errors and tumor motion, an EUD of the CTV of 43.8 Gy
can be obtained for a prescribed dose of 44.2 Gy. By reducing the field siz
e and thus shifting the 95% isodose surface inwards, the EUD increases to a
maximum of 68.3 Gy with a minimum dose in the CTV of 55.2 Gy. This increas
e in EUD is caused by the fact that field size reduction enables escalation
of the prescribed dose while maintaining a constant MLD. Further reduction
of the field size results in decrease of the EUD because the minimum dose
in the CTV becomes so low that it has a predominant effect on the EUD, desp
ite further escalation of the prescribed dose. For the NSCLC patient, the E
UD could be increased from an initial 62.2 Gy for the conventional plan, to
83.2 Gy at maximum. In this maximum, the prescribed dose is 88.1 Gy, and t
he minimum dose in the CTV is 67.4 Gy. In this case, the 95% isodose surfac
e is conformed closely to the "static" CTV during treatment planning.
Conclusions: Iso-NTCP escalation of the probability of tumor control is pos
sible for lung tumors by reducing field sizes and allowing a larger dose in
homogeneity in the CTV. Optimum field sizes can be derived, having the high
est EUD and highest minimum dose in the CTV under condition of a constant N
TCP of the lungs. We conclude that the concept of homogeneous dose in the t
arget volume is not the best approach to reach the highest probability of t
umor control for lung tumors. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.