PURPOSE. To resolve differences in published data on tear antioxidant level
s by comparing the concentration of water-soluble antioxidants in human ref
lex tears collected by capillary tube and by the Schirmer strip collection
method and in basal and reflex tears collected using the Schirmer strip met
hod.
METHODS. Yawn-induced reflex tears (collected Simultaneously by capillary t
ubes and by Schirmer strips) and basal tears (by Schirmer strips and using
local anesthetic) were collected from 12 healthy subjects. Tear cysteine, a
scorbate. glutathione, urate, and tyrosine were measured by high-performanc
e liquid chromatography within a few minutes of collection.
RESULTS. Cysteine, ascorbate, glutathione, and tyrosine were 5 to 10 times
higher (P < 0.01) in both reflex and basal tears collected by Schirmer stri
p compared with reflex tears collected by capillary tube from the same subj
ect. Urate levels were slightly but nonsignificantly higher in Schirmer str
ip samples (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS. The conflict in published data on tear antioxidants is caused
by differences in collection methods. With the exception of urate, antioxid
ants accumulate to very high levels in corneal cells. Spuriously high antio
xidant levels in tears collected using Schirmer strips, therefore, are most
probably caused by contamination with intracellular constituents. The capi
llary tube collection method is proposed as the method of choice for reflex
tear collection for biochemical studies. This less-invasive method facilit
ates the evaluation of tear antioxidant levels as a biomonitoring tool for
corneal health. Although moderately increased antioxidant levels may be ben
eficial, the authors hypothesize that marked increases may indicate damage
to the ocular surface.