PURPOSE. The role of adenosine receptor (AdoR) antagonists in human retinal
endothelial cell function in vitro has previously been determined. In this
study, efficacy of AdoR antagonist administration in reducing retinal neov
ascularization was examined in a mouse pup model of oxygen-induced retinopa
thy.
METHODS. A previously described model of oxygen-induced retinal neovascular
ization in newborn mouse pups was used to examine the effect of various Ado
R antagonists on neovascularization. The nonselective AdoR antagonist xanth
ine amine congener (XAC), the A(2A)-selective antagonist ZM241385, the A(2B
)-selective antagonists 3-N-propylxanthine (enprofylline) and 3-isobutyl-8-
pyrrolidinoxanthine (IPDX), and the A(1)-selective antagonist cyclopentyl-1
,3-dipropylxanthine (CPX) were used. After the hyperoxia exposure the anima
ls received daily intraperitoneal injections of pharmacologically relevant
doses of AdoR antagonists for 5 days. Control animals received vehicle (0.1
% dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]) alone. The animals were then killed and perfus
ed with fluorescein-dextran. WholeMounts of retinas from one eye were prepa
red and examined. whereas the retinas of the contralateral eye were embedde
d. sectioned, and stained for counting neovascular nuclei extending beyond
the internal limiting membrane into the vitreous.
RESULTS. Angiography of wholemount retinas showed reduction of neovascular
tufts in animals treated with selective A(2B) AdoR antagonists. Quantificat
ion of the extraretinal neovascular nuclei showed that only animals treated
with XAC, enprofylline, or IPDX showed a significant reduction in retinal
neovascularization. By contrast, neither CPX nor ZM241385 had an effect on
neovascularization.
CONCLUSIONS. The A(2B)-selective AdoR antagonists inhibited oxygen-induced
retinal neovascularization in vivo and may provide a basis for developing p
harmacologic therapies for the treatment of proliferative retinopathies.