We examine how an auditor's ability to terminate a multi-period client rela
tionship provides the auditor with a real option whose value depends on the
nature of informational asymmetry between the incumbent and other potentia
l auditors. In particular, we isolate conditions under which the auditor's
private and public sources of information behave as complements rather than
substitutes. In such circumstances, increasing the likelihood of publicly
provided information induces the auditor to expend more (rather than less)
resources in private information gathering activities.