F. Lievens et Jm. Conway, Dimension and exercise variance in assessment center scores: A large-scaleevaluation of multitrait-multimethod studies, J APPL PSYC, 86(6), 2001, pp. 1202-1222
This study addresses 3 questions regarding assessment center construct vali
dity: (a) Are assessment center ratings best thought of is reflecting dimen
sion constructs (dimension model). exercises (exercise model). or a combina
tion? (b) To A hat extent do dimensions or exercises account for variance?
(c) Which design characteristics increase dimension variance? To this end,
a large set of multitrait-multimethod studies (N = 34) were analyzed, showi
ng that assessment center ratings were best represented (i.e., in terms of
fit and admissible solutions) by a model with correlated dimensions and exe
rcises specified Lis correlated uniquenesses. In this model. dimension vari
ance equals exercise variance. Significantly more dimension variance was fo
und when fewer dimensions were used and when assessors were psychologists.
Use of behavioral checklists, a lower dimension-exercise ratio. and similar
exercises also increased dimension variance.