Dimension and exercise variance in assessment center scores: A large-scaleevaluation of multitrait-multimethod studies

Citation
F. Lievens et Jm. Conway, Dimension and exercise variance in assessment center scores: A large-scaleevaluation of multitrait-multimethod studies, J APPL PSYC, 86(6), 2001, pp. 1202-1222
Citations number
88
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY
ISSN journal
00219010 → ACNP
Volume
86
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1202 - 1222
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9010(200112)86:6<1202:DAEVIA>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
This study addresses 3 questions regarding assessment center construct vali dity: (a) Are assessment center ratings best thought of is reflecting dimen sion constructs (dimension model). exercises (exercise model). or a combina tion? (b) To A hat extent do dimensions or exercises account for variance? (c) Which design characteristics increase dimension variance? To this end, a large set of multitrait-multimethod studies (N = 34) were analyzed, showi ng that assessment center ratings were best represented (i.e., in terms of fit and admissible solutions) by a model with correlated dimensions and exe rcises specified Lis correlated uniquenesses. In this model. dimension vari ance equals exercise variance. Significantly more dimension variance was fo und when fewer dimensions were used and when assessors were psychologists. Use of behavioral checklists, a lower dimension-exercise ratio. and similar exercises also increased dimension variance.