Eg. Yarmola et al., Formation and implications of a ternary complex of profilin, thymosin beta(4), and actin, J BIOL CHEM, 276(49), 2001, pp. 45555-45563
Data from affinity chromatography, analytical ultracentrifugation, covalent
cross-linking, and fluorescence anisotropy show that profilin, thymosin be
ta (4), and actin form a ternary complex. In contrast, steady-state assays
measuring F-actin concentration are insensitive to the formation of such a
complex. Experiments using a peptide that corresponds to the N terminus of
thymosin beta (4) (residues 6-22) confirm the presence of an extensive bind
ing surface between actin and thymosin beta (4), and explain why thymosin b
eta (4) and profilin can bind simultaneously to actin. Surprisingly, despit
e much lower affinity, the N-terminal thymosin beta (4) peptide has a very
slow dissociation rate constant relative to the intact protein, consistent
with a catalytic effect of the C terminus on conformational change occurrin
g at the N terminus of thymosin beta (4). Intracellular concentrations of t
hymosin beta (4) and profilin may greatly exceed the equilibrium dissociati
on constant of the ternary complex, inconsistent with models showing sequen
tial formation of complexes of profilin-actin or thymosin beta (4)-actin du
ring dynamic remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton. The formation of a terna
ry complex results in a very large amplification mechanism by which profili
n and thymosin beta (4) can sequester much more actin than is possible for
either protein acting alone, providing an explanation for significant seque
stration even if molecular crowding results in a very low critical concentr
ation of actin in vivo.