Selection of a teicoplanin-resistant Enterococcus faecium mutant during anoutbreak caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci with the VanB phenotype

Citation
M. Kawalec et al., Selection of a teicoplanin-resistant Enterococcus faecium mutant during anoutbreak caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci with the VanB phenotype, J CLIN MICR, 39(12), 2001, pp. 4274-4282
Citations number
51
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Microbiology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00951137 → ACNP
Volume
39
Issue
12
Year of publication
2001
Pages
4274 - 4282
Database
ISI
SICI code
0095-1137(200112)39:12<4274:SOATEF>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have recently become an increasing p roblem in hospitals in Poland, being responsible for a growing number of no socomial outbreaks. In this work, we have analyzed the second outbreak of V RE with the VanB phenotype to be identified in the country. It was caused b y clonal dissemination of a single strain of vancomycin-resistant Enterococ cus faecalis (VRES) and horizontal transmission of vancomycin resistance ge nes among several vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREM) strains. Two similar restriction fragment length polymorphism types of the vanB gen e cluster characterized VRES and VREM isolates, and they both contained the same vanB2 variant of the ranB gene. Two vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium (VSEM) isolates, recovered from the same wards during the outbreak, proved to be related to certain VREM isolates and could represent endemic strains that had acquired vancomycin resistance. One VSEM and four VREM isolates, all identified in the same patient, belonged to a single clone, although th ey revealed remarkable diversity in terms of susceptibility, PFGE patterns, plasmid content, and number of vanB gene cluster copies. Most probably the y reflected the dynamic evolution of an E. faecium strain in the course of infection of a single patient. One of the VREM isolates turned out to be re sistant to teicoplanin, which coincided with the use of this antibiotic in the patient's therapy. Its vanB gene variant differed by a single mutation from that found in other isolates; however, it also lacked a large part of the vanB gene cluster, including the regulatory genes vanR(B) and -S-B, and the vancomycin-inducible promoter P-YB. Expression of the resistance genes van(HB), -B, and -X-B was constitutive in the mutant, and this phenomenon was responsible for its unusual phenotype.