Until the beginning of the 1990s, currency crises were typically analyzed w
ithin the framework of a generation of models that assumed that the foreign
exchange reserves of a country that was running a fixed exchange rate poli
cy were falling (because the government was running a deficit on its budget
that was financed by printing money). When the foreign exchange reserves r
eached a lower bound, a speculative attack on the fixed exchange rate was l
aunched. Today, this theory is no longer the benchmark when explaining the
occurrence of a currency crisis. Actually, a new generation of models that
seeks to take explicitly into account the costs and benefits associated wit
h the maintenance of a fixed exchange rate has emerged. This paper surveys
these 'second generation models of currency crises'. This generation of mod
els emphasizes that it is an endogenous decision if a government chooses to
abandon a policy of fixed exchange rates. The survey pays special attentio
n to the fact that the second generation of currency crises models often ge
nerates multiple equilibria for the rate of devaluation given one state of
the economic fundamentals. A currency crisis can thus occur even if no secu
lar trend in economic fundamentals can be identified, as in recent currency
crises.