Kj. Boone et al., Post retention: The effect of sequence of post-space preparation, cementation time, and different sealers, J ENDODONT, 27(12), 2001, pp. 768-771
Many endodontic sealers contain constituents that have been shown to inhibi
t the polymerization of resin cements. This may be important when prefabric
ated posts are cemented at the same appointment as root canal obturation. T
his study evaluated the effects of cementing posts with a resin cement imme
diately or at a delayed time period after obturation using Roth's 801 Elite
Grade or AH26 sealer cements. The contribution of mechanical post-space pr
eparation was also assessed as a critical variable. One hundred twenty extr
acted canines were randomly divided into eight experimental groups. The var
iables evaluated were the order of post preparation (either before or after
obturation), the type of sealer used, and the time of post cementation. Al
l teeth received a stainless steel #6 Parapost XP cemented with a resin cem
ent, Panavia 21. Each experimental group underwent tensile testing for rete
ntion using an Instron universal testing machine. For both sealers posts ce
mented in teeth in which the canal was obturated before post-space preparat
ion and thus had sealer-contaminated dentin removed by the space preparatio
n procedure had significantly higher retentive values than those obturated
after post-space preparation in which contaminated dentin might remain. Sea
ler used and time of cementation had no specific effect on retention. Achie
ving a clean, "freshened" dentinal surface during mechanical post-space pre
paration seems to be a critical variable for post retention when a resin ce
ment is used.