Studies have suggested that urban agglomeration enhances productivity by fa
cilitating the firm-worker matching process. This article develops a model
that formalizes this notion and demonstrates that, when firm capital and wo
rker skill are complementary in production, urban agglomeration will tend t
o generate more efficient, yet segregated matches. As a result, not only wi
ll local market size be positively associated with average productivity, it
will also generate greater between-skill-group wage inequality and a highe
r expected return to skill acquisition. Recent data from the counties and m
etropolitan areas of the United States is consistent with each of these imp
lications.