Low-bandwidth video has a place in health service delivery. Videoconferenci
ng systems commonly used in telehealth have a high capital cost, take days
or weeks to install at specific locations, and have high communications cha
rges. A range of circumstances can be envisaged where video may be of benef
it but would not justify the cost of large systems. There are projects in c
ommunity nursing, home dialysis and post-acute respiratory care where vario
us low-bandwidth video technologies have been added as a supplement to the
humble telephone call. It can be expected that at least some of these proje
cts will be able to demonstrate tangible improvements in health outcomes, s
uch as decreased readmission rates, reduced acute episodes of a chronic ill
ness and improved health status from the additional social support.