There is a surprising lack of published experience on the use of videoconfe
rencing in clinical genetics. Patients were randomly allocated to either a
telegenetic (cases) or face-to-face (control) conventional clinic. The tele
genetic consultation was done by videoconferencing, using ISDN lines at 384
kbit/s. Evaluation by the doctor and counsellor took place immediately aft
er each appointment. The patient was asked to evaluate the appointment by t
elephone questionnaire about four weeks after the event. Forty-two patients
were invited to participate and 33 (79%) returned their consent forms. Fou
r patients declined to participate and were seen in ordinary face-to-face c
linics. Preliminary results showed that the assessment of the telegenetics
consultations by doctors, counsellors and patients was very favourable, and
they responded positively when asked if they would be happy to use telemed
icine in the future. For use in selected consultations, videoconferencing d
oes appear to fulfil a useful role in clinical genetics.