Measurement characteristics of 2 different self-monitoring tools used in adietary intervention study

Citation
Lf. Tinker et al., Measurement characteristics of 2 different self-monitoring tools used in adietary intervention study, J AM DIET A, 101(9), 2001, pp. 1031-1040
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science/Nutrition","Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION
ISSN journal
00028223 → ACNP
Volume
101
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1031 - 1040
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8223(200109)101:9<1031:MCO2DS>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Objective To examine the measurement characteristics of 2 self-monitoring t ools, a food diary and fat scan, used in the dietary intervention of the Wo men's Health Trial: Feasibility in Minority Populations study. Design Comparison of fat intake reported on the self-monitoring tools to a criterion measure of fat intake, specifically the mean of a food frequency questionnaire and a 4-day food record. The main outcome measures were diffe rences in fat grams and correlations between each of the self-monitoring to ols and the criterion measure. Subjects/setting Six-month post randomization data from 313 women aged 50 t o 79 years who participated in the intervention group of the Women's Health Trial: Feasibility in Minority Populations study. Results Both self-monitoring tools underestimated fat intake compared to th e criterion measure, the food diary by 9 g and the fat scan by 6 g. The sel f-monitoring instruments were better than chance at detecting a love-fat di etary pattern, however, and did not differ from each other in their ability to do so. Applications/conclusions The self-monitoring tools were modestly precise as measures of fat intake, but neither was sufficiently accurate to be reliab le as a sole assessment of dietary adherence. Dietetics professionals are e ncouraged to assess the measurement. properties of self-monitoring tools to use them appropriately in supporting dietary changes.