The turbulent flow with wake, reattachment and recirculation is a very impo
rtant problem that is related to vehicle dynamics and aerodynamics. The Sma
gorinsky Model (SM), the Dynamics Subgrid Scale Model (DSM), and the Lagran
gian Dynamic Subgrid Scale Model (LDSM) are used to predict the three-dimen
sional flow field around a bluff body model. The Reynolds number used is 45
,000 based on the bulk velocity and the height of the bluff body. The fully
developed turbulent flow, which is generated by the driver part, is used f
or the inlet boundary condition. The convective boundary condition is impos
ed on the outlet boundary condition, and the Spalding wall function is used
for the wall boundary condition. We compare the results of each model with
the results of the PIV measurement. First of all, the LES predicts flow be
havior better than the k-epsilon turbulence model. When we compare various
LES models, the DSM and the LDSM agree with the PIV experimental data bette
r than the SM in the complex flow, with the separation and the reattachment
at the upper front part of the bluff body. But in the rear part of the blu
ff body, the SM agrees with the PIV experimental results better than them.
In this case, the SM predicts overall flow behavior better than the DSM and
the LDSM.