Mb. Landers et Vj. Fraser, ANTIVIRAL CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS AFTER OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS - WHY, WHEN, WHERE, AND WHAT, American journal of ophthalmology, 124(2), 1997, pp. 234-239
PURPOSE: To update ophthalmologists on recent developments in the area
of antiviral chemoprophylaxis after occupational exposure to human im
munodeficiency virus (HIV). Background information is provided by whic
h to make an informed decision about whether to initiate antiviral che
moprophylaxis against HIV infection. METHODS: We discuss why HIV poste
xposure prophylaxis should be considered; when prophylaxis should be i
nitiated; where prophylaxis medications should be located in the opera
ting or emergency room; and what medications might be used and the fac
tors influencing their selection. Recent provisional recommendations b
y the Unit ed States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and th
e International AIDS Society-USA are reviewed along with literature de
aling with antiviral chemoprophylaxis against HIV infection. RESULTS:
Recommendations are made for specific antiviral chemoprophylaxis after
occupational exposure to HIV based on the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention and the International AIDS Society-USA provisional rec
ommendations. Uncertain areas and the minor discrepancies in these two
reports are discussed.CONCLUSIONS: Prevention of HIV transmission aft
er accidental occupational exposure is possible. Combination therapy i
s more effective than monotherapy in treating HIV infections. Zidovudi
ne (AZT or ZDV) is effective in postexposure prophylaxis; the combinat
ion of zidovudine and lamivudine (3TC) and indinavir (IDV) has greater
antiretroviral activity than zidovudine alone does. The requirements
for effective HIV postexposure prophylaxis may be somewhat different t
han those for optimum HIV treatment in the chronically ill HIV-positiv
e patient. Ophthalmologists should have an in depth knowledge of curre
nt thinking regarding HIV pathophysiology and treatment.