Inflammation leads to intestinal dysmotility which can be due to both funct
ional and trophic alterations of the neuromuscular apparatus. To discrimina
te between trophic and functional changes, several normalization procedures
are used in contractility studies. It is important to know how normalizati
on procedures may influence the obtained results.
In a rat model of TNBS-induced ileitis, we compared seven known normalizati
on procedures for pharmacological contractions of longitudinal muscle strip
s.
During acute ileitis, contractility was significantly decreased, irrespecti
ve of the normalization procedure used. During the post-inflammation phase,
hypertrophy and hyperplasia of smooth muscle cells led to increased contra
ctility on raw strip chart recordings. However, when contractions were corr
ected for the increase in muscle mass, the contractility was either normal
or decreased, depending on the normalization procedure used. Normalization
of contractions to the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the longitudinal muscl
e is the gold standard. Comparison of three methods to determine the CSA, s
howed that the commonly used equation to calculate the CSA, based on the ti
ssue weight, length and density, might overestimate the CSA. We conclude th
at this equation should be adapted by a muscle thickness ratio, or alternat
ively the CSA can be determined on histological sections.