E.H. Norman, a historian and Canadian diplomat posted to Japan during most
of the Occupation, was intimately involved with the crafting of Japan's pos
twar constitution. His views on the constitution and the monarchy first dev
eloped as part of his responsibilities as an analyst with Canadian intellig
ence during the war. They further evolved after he was seconded to MacArthu
r's staff in the fall of 1945 and during his subsequent tenure as Canada's
main representative to the Far Eastern Commission. There he played a leadin
g role in the Constitutional and Legal Affairs Committee. This article exam
ines Norman's views on the constitution and the Emperor as they evolved in
the 1943-1950 period. It suggests that Norman's views on the constitutional
process differed radically from those of General MacArthur but that in the
end, the Canadian government declined to challenge U.S. hegemony over Occu
pation policy. Thus Norman no longer pursued the agenda he had laid out and
instead accepted the reformed monarchy and the constitution as the lesser
of evils. The origins of Japan's postwar constitution have come under scrut
iny as constitutional research commissions in both the upper and lower hous
es of Japan's Diet investigate the postwar constitution with an eye to revi
sing it within the next five.