Pm. Lugagne et al., URETEROILEAL IMPLANTATION IN ORTHOTOPIC NEOBLADDER WITH THE LE-DUC-CAMEY MUCOSAL-THROUGH TECHNIQUE - RISK OF STENOSIS AND LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP, The Journal of urology, 158(3), 1997, pp. 765-767
Purpose: We determined the postoperative risk of nonneoplastic uretero
ileal implantation stenosis using the Le Duc-Camey technique, and asse
ssed the extent to which followup is mandatory. Materials and Methods:
Between October 1980 and October 1989, after a cystoprostatectomy, 15
8 consecutive men underwent lower urinary tract reconstruction by mean
s of a U-shaped orthotopic ileal neobladder. Of these cases 109 were t
ubularized and 49 were detubularized. The 313 ureteral implantations w
ere performed according to the Le Duc-Camey mucosal-through technique.
Followup studies in all patients consisted of excretory urography or
renal sonography carried out before discharge home, at least every 6 m
onths during the first year after surgery and once a year thereafter.
Followup was more than 2 years for 123 patients. The study was conduct
ed retrospectively. Results: The rate of anastomotic stenosis was 4.9%
among 123 patients who were followed a minimum of 2 years. No obstruc
tions were detected after 2 years. The rates of ureteral reimplantatio
n and nephrectomy for chronic kidney obstruction were 3.7% and 2%, res
pectively. All strictures were located at the anastomosed site, and re
trograde catheterization was uncertain. Surgical reimplantation throug
h an elective extraperitoneal approach was easy to perform and effecti
ve. Conclusions: The anastomotic stenosis rate after Le Duc-Camey uret
eroileal implantation in orthotopic U-shaped neobladder was 4.9%. Duri
ng the first year after surgery, the difference between true stenosis
and temporary edema was not easy to assess. The U-shaped neobladder al
lows for the implantation of a minimally dissected iliac ureter, which
could be a factor in minimizing the risk of obstruction.