Purpose: We initiated a prospective study to verify or refute the comp
lications of lymphocele formation and excessive blood loss associated
with heparin prophylaxis in pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostat
ectomy. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was completed on 57
9 men undergoing pelvic lymphadenectomy usually in association with ra
dical prostatectomy. Patients were assigned to group 1 (given preopera
tive and postoperative subcutaneous heparin) and group 2 (no heparin).
All patients were evaluated 2 to 3 weeks after surgery with ultrasoun
d for pelvic lymphocele. Results: There was no statistically significa
nt difference in the number or size of pelvic lymphoceles or blood los
s in group 1 versus group 2. Conclusions: The use of heparin prophylax
is to prevent thromboembolic complications in conjunction with pelvic
lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy is not associated with incre
ased blood loss or increased rate of lymphocele formation.