Ward (2000) justifies contemporary research on social-perceptual biases by
suggesting that biases are rare and that they, because of their rarity, rev
eal the properties of the social-perceptual apparatus. I take this argument
to mean that social biases are analogous to visual illusions: odd but info
rmative. Sometimes, this analogy works, but as a general theoretical platfo
rm, it is inadequate. I address this epistemic disagreement by disputing th
ree of Ward's specific claims. Pragmatically, however, I agree with Ward on
that some biases demand attention because they yield large effects and und
esirable social consequences.